Looking at both spinner’s spun articles, they both seem to generate spun content that looks pretty good. Both have some grammar issues I would correct if I was posting it on a high tier 1 site, but overall SpinnerChief produced better content. Not sure if WordAi is being overly aggressive on the spins at the cost of quality. This test is very hard to call. If you go by raw numbers, SpinnerChief won. I want to leave this up to you to decide which one won. Winner none – draw!
Imo it is not possible for google to detect properly spun content, it is not worth computing power it requires. They can do this using ngrams for example, but it is uses a lot of queries. And for example article spinner I coded beats this algo, so google cant detect that the content is spun. Manual spinning is also good but it takes more than 30 minutes per article.

I personally love this one. It creates amazing content and is extremely affordable. We use a combination of WordAI and Spin Rewriter for our SEO projects, because these two are just an amazing combination. I think Spin Rewriter beats the “Standard Spinner” of WordAI in terms of quality and human readability, but loses to its “Turing Spinner”. So what we do is use the “Turing Spinner” for Tier 1 projects and then Spin Rewriter for the lower tiers. Sometimes we might switch them up, but it really depends a lot on the situation.
That’s really weird. I have tested WordAI and Spin Rewriter with Copyscape and the results were always 80%+ uniquness, even 90%+. I don’t know how u spun the content to achieve such low results, but this is definitely way too bad. As for the block spinning, I have to be honest, this is the first time I’m hearing of it and I will have to check it out when I have a bit of time, but generally, yes, in the best case scenario, you would manually touch your Tier 1 content to make it 100% human readable and as unique as possible. For lower tiers, you can do pretty much anything, but again, the better quality of content, the better results you will have. That’s in my opinion and experience.
Owner is a scammer who has been banned from major SEO forums for fraudulent and deceptive practices. You might be willing to look past the fact that the owner of this product creates fake accounts to post fake reviews and lies about the product if the product itself was actually good, but unfortunately Spinner Chief itself is filled with half baked buggy features (which are advertised as working completely) and can't go more than 10 minutes without crashing. All in all it is a complete waste of money and time.
There are many people who still prefer rewriting their articles by hand. They are used to write sentence after sentence and rephrase their content to ensure the quality of writing. Although it is the safest approach but it can take hours or days to complete a task. On the other hand, there also exist people who are either too lazy to rewrite their content or they understand the importance of time and hence, they look for an article spinner tool or paraphrasing tool.
Anybody may do that, all you will need is the ability to chain a sentence jointly and a computer. You're able to compose original articles and distribute them to post submission sites and get paid. You will need to apply to these sites and might or might not get rejected. Should you happen to get rejected then just keep plugging away till you find some body to "hire" you.
Although the idea of quickly being able to create content might sound fantastic, it certainly has its disadvantages. Firstly, Google don’t like badly written content. In the past article spinners have been renown for creating poor quality content. Badly written articles are something that Google hates and you won’t make any human friends with it either.
×