We tried and we tested. We spinned and we unspinned. After all said and done here, I think you should have already made your choice about which spinner is best for you. If you will be doing a lot of manual spinning, then The Best Spinner is probably the best choice. On the other hand, if you will be using the spinner just for automatic spinning, and you have enough capital, WordAI is the spinning tool for you. But if you are still on a budget, Spin Rewriter is your spinner. However, if you are going to be spinning text in languages other than English, you might want to go with either Spinner Chief or Chimp Rewriter. The choice is all yours. You can now make an informed decision.

Finest spinner in the market today and more for me because saves a lot of my time... Earlier i have used the best spinner but this spinner is 10 times better faster, easy to use, and articles make more sense, unique, also helps in preparing new articles and spins same article into hundred of more articles for back-linking, etc. 2 thumbs-up... simple and easy to use...

Aaron Sustar is a well-known name in the online marketing field. Back in 2007  he started his own successful online business and hasn’t looked back since.   He describes himself as an entrepreneur, programmer and in love with life, he considers himself more of a “science” guy than a “marketing” guy.  Aaron Sustar passionately works on improving Spin Rewriter, a software he developed.
I wanted to add some phrases in the text to see if the spinner will understand them and possibly replace them with similar phrases. As you see, this is just a simple short story that blew out of my head just a minute ago. As a final note of the intro section, I want you to understand that “thesaurus” simply means a database of words and their synonyms. Let’s see how this goes.
Spinning Speed – How quick can these spinners spin the article above. WordAi took 3 minutes and 48 seconds and SpinerChief III Ultimate using Super Spin in the balanced setting (meaning try to be unique as possible while still being readable) took less than 3 seconds to generate. I’ve had WordAi take 5+ minutes before, they need to speed things up. Clearly SpinnerChief won the speed test.
!function(n,t){function r(e,n){return Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,n)}function i(e){return void 0===e}if(n){var o={},s=n.TraceKit,a=[].slice,l="?";o.noConflict=function(){return n.TraceKit=s,o},o.wrap=function(e){function n(){try{return e.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw o.report(e),e}}return n},o.report=function(){function e(e){l(),h.push(e)}function t(e){for(var n=h.length-1;n>=0;--n)h[n]===e&&h.splice(n,1)}function i(e,n){var t=null;if(!n||o.collectWindowErrors){for(var i in h)if(r(h,i))try{h[i].apply(null,[e].concat(a.call(arguments,2)))}catch(e){t=e}if(t)throw t}}function s(e,n,t,r,s){var a=null;if(w)o.computeStackTrace.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement(w,n,t,e),u();else if(s)a=o.computeStackTrace(s),i(a,!0);else{var l={url:n,line:t,column:r};l.func=o.computeStackTrace.guessFunctionName(l.url,l.line),l.context=o.computeStackTrace.gatherContext(l.url,l.line),a={mode:"onerror",message:e,stack:[l]},i(a,!0)}return!!f&&f.apply(this,arguments)}function l(){!0!==d&&(f=n.onerror,n.onerror=s,d=!0)}function u(){var e=w,n=p;p=null,w=null,m=null,i.apply(null,[e,!1].concat(n))}function c(e){if(w){if(m===e)return;u()}var t=o.computeStackTrace(e);throw w=t,m=e,p=a.call(arguments,1),n.setTimeout(function(){m===e&&u()},t.incomplete?2e3:0),e}var f,d,h=[],p=null,m=null,w=null;return c.subscribe=e,c.unsubscribe=t,c}(),o.computeStackTrace=function(){function e(e){if(!o.remoteFetching)return"";try{var t=function(){try{return new n.XMLHttpRequest}catch(e){return new n.ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP")}},r=t();return r.open("GET",e,!1),r.send(""),r.responseText}catch(e){return""}}function t(t){if("string"!=typeof t)return[];if(!r(j,t)){var i="",o="";try{o=n.document.domain}catch(e){}var s=/(.*)\:\/\/([^:\/]+)([:\d]*)\/{0,1}([\s\S]*)/.exec(t);s&&s[2]===o&&(i=e(t)),j[t]=i?i.split("\n"):[]}return j[t]}function s(e,n){var r,o=/function ([^(]*)\(([^)]*)\)/,s=/['"]?([0-9A-Za-z$_]+)['"]?\s*[:=]\s*(function|eval|new Function)/,a="",u=10,c=t(e);if(!c.length)return l;for(var f=0;f0?s:null}function u(e){return e.replace(/[\-\[\]{}()*+?.,\\\^$|#]/g,"\\$&")}function c(e){return u(e).replace("<","(?:<|<)").replace(">","(?:>|>)").replace("&","(?:&|&)").replace('"','(?:"|")').replace(/\s+/g,"\\s+")}function f(e,n){for(var r,i,o=0,s=n.length;or&&(i=s.exec(o[r]))?i.index:null}function h(e){if(!i(n&&n.document)){for(var t,r,o,s,a=[n.location.href],l=n.document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=""+e,h=/^function(?:\s+([\w$]+))?\s*\(([\w\s,]*)\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,p=/^function on([\w$]+)\s*\(event\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,m=0;m]+)>|([^\)]+))\((.*)\))? in (.*):\s*$/i,o=n.split("\n"),l=[],u=0;u=0&&(g.line=v+x.substring(0,j).split("\n").length)}}}else if(o=d.exec(i[y])){var _=n.location.href.replace(/#.*$/,""),T=new RegExp(c(i[y+1])),E=f(T,[_]);g={url:_,func:"",args:[],line:E?E.line:o[1],column:null}}if(g){g.func||(g.func=s(g.url,g.line));var k=a(g.url,g.line),A=k?k[Math.floor(k.length/2)]:null;k&&A.replace(/^\s*/,"")===i[y+1].replace(/^\s*/,"")?g.context=k:g.context=[i[y+1]],h.push(g)}}return h.length?{mode:"multiline",name:e.name,message:i[0],stack:h}:null}function y(e,n,t,r){var i={url:n,line:t};if(i.url&&i.line){e.incomplete=!1,i.func||(i.func=s(i.url,i.line)),i.context||(i.context=a(i.url,i.line));var o=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(r);if(o&&(i.column=d(o[1],i.url,i.line)),e.stack.length>0&&e.stack[0].url===i.url){if(e.stack[0].line===i.line)return!1;if(!e.stack[0].line&&e.stack[0].func===i.func)return e.stack[0].line=i.line,e.stack[0].context=i.context,!1}return e.stack.unshift(i),e.partial=!0,!0}return e.incomplete=!0,!1}function g(e,n){for(var t,r,i,a=/function\s+([_$a-zA-Z\xA0-\uFFFF][_$a-zA-Z0-9\xA0-\uFFFF]*)?\s*\(/i,u=[],c={},f=!1,p=g.caller;p&&!f;p=p.caller)if(p!==v&&p!==o.report){if(r={url:null,func:l,args:[],line:null,column:null},p.name?r.func=p.name:(t=a.exec(p.toString()))&&(r.func=t[1]),"undefined"==typeof r.func)try{r.func=t.input.substring(0,t.input.indexOf("{"))}catch(e){}if(i=h(p)){r.url=i.url,r.line=i.line,r.func===l&&(r.func=s(r.url,r.line));var m=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(e.message||e.description);m&&(r.column=d(m[1],i.url,i.line))}c[""+p]?f=!0:c[""+p]=!0,u.push(r)}n&&u.splice(0,n);var w={mode:"callers",name:e.name,message:e.message,stack:u};return y(w,e.sourceURL||e.fileName,e.line||e.lineNumber,e.message||e.description),w}function v(e,n){var t=null;n=null==n?0:+n;try{if(t=m(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=p(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=w(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=g(e,n+1))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}return{mode:"failed"}}function b(e){e=1+(null==e?0:+e);try{throw new Error}catch(n){return v(n,e+1)}}var x=!1,j={};return v.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement=y,v.guessFunctionName=s,v.gatherContext=a,v.ofCaller=b,v.getSource=t,v}(),o.extendToAsynchronousCallbacks=function(){var e=function(e){var t=n[e];n[e]=function(){var e=a.call(arguments),n=e[0];return"function"==typeof n&&(e[0]=o.wrap(n)),t.apply?t.apply(this,e):t(e[0],e[1])}};e("setTimeout"),e("setInterval")},o.remoteFetching||(o.remoteFetching=!0),o.collectWindowErrors||(o.collectWindowErrors=!0),(!o.linesOfContext||o.linesOfContext<1)&&(o.linesOfContext=11),void 0!==e&&e.exports&&n.module!==e?e.exports=o:"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define("TraceKit",[],o):n.TraceKit=o}}("undefined"!=typeof window?window:global)},"./webpack-loaders/expose-loader/index.js?require!./shared/require-global.js":function(e,n,t){(function(n){e.exports=n.require=t("./shared/require-global.js")}).call(n,t("../../../lib/node_modules/webpack/buildin/global.js"))}});

There are lots of reviews about the product, and many people here are writers that experienced a wonderful time doing their job with the aid of the tool. Most of these people usually say that you dont need to rely on the tool completely to get the job done because that will fail at most times. What you need to do according to the reviewers is that you should learn how to edit the article a bit so that it wont look completely spun since there are some clients that hate this tool.


So you are still doing it? I have stopped using spin content after panda update way couple of years ago. As content become king and the user expereince the key to earn website authority, I started focusing on writing more meaningful and engaging content. I never cam across any spinner that time which makes total sense after spinning. The spin content either looked very bad or it needed manual review. I forgot the name of the spinner tool as well. Looking forward for replied from more experts here as it could be an eye opener for me if spinning still works.
"I want to say thanks so much to the developer of Spinner Chief! It really makes my jobs easier. Before I use Spinner Chief. I always make some articles by my self. I do that to get some unique articles and to get high quality backlinks. I'm very tired to do that. So, I searched in google the software which can help my jobs. The software which be able to make an article become unique by spinning it. I found a website which offer a spinning tools, but it have us to pay for it in the large amount. I was frustated. Finally, my friend told me about Spinner Chief. WoW! Very Amazing! It's free! And the most important, IT'S VERY POWERFULL! So this product is HIGHLY RECOMENDED!!You won't regret to use this POWERFUL TOOLS!"
We tried and we tested. We spinned and we unspinned. After all said and done here, I think you should have already made your choice about which spinner is best for you. If you will be doing a lot of manual spinning, then The Best Spinner is probably the best choice. On the other hand, if you will be using the spinner just for automatic spinning, and you have enough capital, WordAI is the spinning tool for you. But if you are still on a budget, Spin Rewriter is your spinner. However, if you are going to be spinning text in languages other than English, you might want to go with either Spinner Chief or Chimp Rewriter. The choice is all yours. You can now make an informed decision.

I personally love this one. It creates amazing content and is extremely affordable. We use a combination of WordAI and Spin Rewriter for our SEO projects, because these two are just an amazing combination. I think Spin Rewriter beats the “Standard Spinner” of WordAI in terms of quality and human readability, but loses to its “Turing Spinner”. So what we do is use the “Turing Spinner” for Tier 1 projects and then Spin Rewriter for the lower tiers. Sometimes we might switch them up, but it really depends a lot on the situation.
Manual spinnig is still needed when you want to create ultimate spun and readable articles. You must spin paragraphs and sentences if you want to create the ultimate spun article, it used to be a pain to spin huge articles in paragraph and sentence mode, the nested text always made it diffcult to find the right sentence. But now, with SpinnerChief 5's spin tree function, everything becomes clear and easy! All paragraphs and sentences are organized very well, you can locate, modify and spin them easily.
The simple fact of the matter is that, as an Internet marketer, you need something better than artificial link building and pages of useless, jumbled nonsense to get long-lasting traffic referrals from major search engines such as Google, Bing and Yahoo. Google in particular pays special attention to your visitors' behavior. So if visitors are quickly navigating elsewhere because your site is full of junk content, then you will get fewer traffic referrals from Google over the long run.
Spin Rewriter 9.0 is designed to create lots of content. You can give the software any article that you find online and the software will produce multiple (re-written) versions of the text. This means that you can quickly create 5 or 10 articles that can be distributed around the internet. This might sound like an easy way to write lots of content, but things aren’t always that simple. Many bloggers who don’t want to spend time creating their own content use this kind of software to produce their articles. Normally the results are really bad. But Spin Rewriter 9.0 claims to be different. Very different in fact…
×