Not sure about version 1, but I'm testing version 2 right now and I have to say it's the best auto spinner I've seen bar none. The content is actually extremely readable and probably better than the manual spins a lot of people do out there. However, some of the content doesn't pass copyscape so make sure you play around with the settings. Minor edits should do the trick. I'm on the trial now but seriously thinking of keeping the Turing plan for my Tier 1 content.
In this day and age, it is by far the one of the hardest tasks to do online always coming up with fresh content for Google to devour. I love how easy Spin Re-Writer makes it for online marketers to get on with their business and not have to worry about the big G penalising their sites. Of course it's not just about fresh content, but it is certainly a big factor. Thanks Aaron and the team...:)
The most common way for people to find products or services online is to use search engines, especially Google, Bing or Yahoo. These search engines have certain criteria for giving websites more (or less) opportunity to be returned in search results. The way to obtain dependable, long term search engine optimization is to post as much quality content to your website as possible. The more unique readable text your site contains, the more logical area search engines will have to index and thus refer people to your site. More quality content means more opportunities for your website or blog to receive traffic from major search engines.
Other article spinners also require that you enter your own custom synonyms manually or individually approve lists of potential synonyms as they are presented to you. This is another way of expecting you to do most of thinking, as opposed to expecting the software to be smart enough to instantly make judgment calls for you. Thus, one of Spinbot's main goals is to make the article spinning process as quick and painless as possible.
Imo it is not possible for google to detect properly spun content, it is not worth computing power it requires. They can do this using ngrams for example, but it is uses a lot of queries. And for example article spinner I coded beats this algo, so google cant detect that the content is spun. Manual spinning is also good but it takes more than 30 minutes per article.
Spin Rewriter 9.0 allows their users to have hundreds of articles of similar high quality in a short amount of time. They have updated the ENL Semantic Spinning engine to include synonyms and sentence structure variants. Their article software that is spinning is of the best in the market and they have kept their costs affordable. Website professionals are using spin Rewriter. High profile customers have stated; the Rewriter tool is used with a marketing budget as a savings model for any business.
This software serves a purpose and fills a gap in the market. Many people will buy this software as they believe its a fast way of creating content. Others will buy the software so that it interacts with another piece of software like Article Marketing Robot for instance. No doubt this software will make many thousands in profits. Personally, I won’t be getting involved and here’s why…
But it is the most important that the spun text, especially with version 2.0 usually passes CS test, and Google cannot even see it as spun content. Such as content can be used for links building as well as on money sites and qualitity is pretty good, as you saw in the example. It is much better than other article spinners with similar pricing as they do not get the right meaning of each and every word, so the rewrites sometimes looks funny/strange. It is of course much better than any free article spinner/rewriter I have tried.
Has a 250,000 words monthly limit on the “Turing Spinner” and a 2,500,000 words monthly limit on the “Standard Spinner”. Anything above that will be charged additionally ($10 per 1,000,000 words for the “Standard Spinner”, and $3 per 10,000 for the “Turing Spinner”). However, they do offer custom plans for heavy API users – all you need to do is contact them.