SpinnerChief 5 has super-advanced functions such as auto-grammar fix, for example it will correct "a apple" to "an apple," plus it can spin "I want to eat the apple, orange and banana" to "I want to eat the banana, orange and apple." We can't list all functions here, there are too many to list! - But one thing is sure, SpinnerChief 5 will give you the best rewritten article - no other spinner can do what SpinnerChief 5 does!
SpinnerChief 5 has super-advanced functions such as auto-grammar fix, for example it will correct "a apple" to "an apple," plus it can spin "I want to eat the apple, orange and banana" to "I want to eat the banana, orange and apple." We can't list all functions here, there are too many to list! - But one thing is sure, SpinnerChief 5 will give you the best rewritten article - no other spinner can do what SpinnerChief 5 does!

Spin Rewriter 9.0 is available exclusively on their website from the 4th October 2018.  If you test drive their software for free before the 4th Ocboter 2018 you will be testing version 8.0.   Get a free consultation to see how the Spin Rewriter 9.0 can work for you. Their professionals are there to assist you with your article rewriting questions and concerns.


Some writers search for mountains of inexpensive private label rights articles and edit them before posting them. These PLR articles might maybe not be the finest quality but something can be increased by the rewriting. These PLR articles are utilized as a result of fact that actually although the quality is poor, they nevertheless have aided attract visitors.
After rewriting and keeping the dynamics of the writing same, our tool passes it through a plagiarism checker. This ensures that the legal standard of plagiarism is maintained after rewriting the article. After all this process, a final rewritten form is presented to you. All this process may require some time depending upon the nature and length of the article to be rewritten.
Very Fast Results - The main benefit that you can get with the tool is that you will be able to get very fast results when it comes to your rewrites. Its a well known fact that this product has been updated over time to the point where it can rewrite a 500 word article into something thats new and unique to the eyes of potential viewers within 9 seconds or less compared to the past version where it will take 2 minutes to finish rewriting.
But it is the most important that the spun text, especially with version 2.0 usually passes CS test, and Google cannot even see it as spun content. Such as content can be used for links building as well as on money sites and qualitity is pretty good, as you saw in the example. It is much better than other article spinners with similar pricing as they do not get the right meaning of each and every word, so the rewrites sometimes looks funny/strange. It is of course much better than any free article spinner/rewriter I have tried.
Some positive aspects to writing articles and selling them on the internet is that you get to supplement your monthly income. In this rough economy who can't use a few extra bucks? Another upside is that you can build up your cache of original content and increase your reputation for writing and possibly attract some higher paying customers. Lastly, just think of the knowledge you are gaining by having to research some of the topics you write about. You are, or will soon be, a fountain of useless information.

No! It is not necessary to use rewriting tool. It is designed for the people with poor English to fulfill their needs. If you are a professional content writer, then it’s also useful for you. It will enable you to increase your vocabulary and synonyms memory. Recently, we have added up to 500,000 synonyms in this tool for english language and it will enable you to create content with more professionally.


Some writers browse for batches of cheap private ticket rights articles and spinning them before submitting them. These PLR articles might not be the best quality but anything can be much better upon by the spinner. These PLR content are utilised anticipated to the actuality that though the level of quality is average even, they possess helped catch the attention of in website traffic still.
That’s really weird. I have tested WordAI and Spin Rewriter with Copyscape and the results were always 80%+ uniquness, even 90%+. I don’t know how u spun the content to achieve such low results, but this is definitely way too bad. As for the block spinning, I have to be honest, this is the first time I’m hearing of it and I will have to check it out when I have a bit of time, but generally, yes, in the best case scenario, you would manually touch your Tier 1 content to make it 100% human readable and as unique as possible. For lower tiers, you can do pretty much anything, but again, the better quality of content, the better results you will have. That’s in my opinion and experience.
!function(e){function n(t){if(r[t])return r[t].exports;var i=r[t]={i:t,l:!1,exports:{}};return e[t].call(i.exports,i,i.exports,n),i.l=!0,i.exports}var t=window.webpackJsonp;window.webpackJsonp=function(n,r,o){for(var s,a,l=0,u=[];l1)for(var t=1;td)return!1;if(p>f)return!1;var e=window.require.hasModule("shared/browser")&&window.require("shared/browser");return!e||!e.opera}function a(){var e="";return"quora.com"==window.Q.subdomainSuffix&&(e+=[window.location.protocol,"//log.quora.com"].join("")),e+="/ajax/log_errors_3RD_PARTY_POST"}function l(){var e=o(h);h=[],0!==e.length&&c(a(),{revision:window.Q.revision,errors:JSON.stringify(e)})}var u=t("./third_party/tracekit.js"),c=t("./shared/basicrpc.js").rpc;u.remoteFetching=!1,u.collectWindowErrors=!0,u.report.subscribe(r);var f=10,d=window.Q&&window.Q.errorSamplingRate||1,h=[],p=0,m=i(l,1e3),w=window.console&&!(window.NODE_JS&&window.UNIT_TEST);n.report=function(e){try{w&&console.error(e.stack||e),u.report(e)}catch(e){}};var y=function(e,n,t){r({name:n,message:t,source:e,stack:u.computeStackTrace.ofCaller().stack||[]}),w&&console.error(t)};n.logJsError=y.bind(null,"js"),n.logMobileJsError=y.bind(null,"mobile_js")},"./shared/globals.js":function(e,n,t){var r=t("./shared/links.js");(window.Q=window.Q||{}).openUrl=function(e,n){var t=e.href;return r.linkClicked(t,n),window.open(t).opener=null,!1}},"./shared/links.js":function(e,n){var t=[];n.onLinkClick=function(e){t.push(e)},n.linkClicked=function(e,n){for(var r=0;r>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError;for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=0;r>>0,r=arguments.length>=2?arguments[1]:void 0,i=0;i>>0;if(0===i)return-1;var o=+n||0;if(Math.abs(o)===Infinity&&(o=0),o>=i)return-1;for(t=Math.max(o>=0?o:i-Math.abs(o),0);t>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError(e+" is not a function");for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=0;r>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError(e+" is not a function");for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=new Array(s),i=0;i>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError;for(var r=[],i=arguments.length>=2?arguments[1]:void 0,o=0;o>>0,i=0;if(2==arguments.length)n=arguments[1];else{for(;i=r)throw new TypeError("Reduce of empty array with no initial value");n=t[i++]}for(;i>>0;if(0===i)return-1;for(n=i-1,arguments.length>1&&(n=Number(arguments[1]),n!=n?n=0:0!==n&&n!=1/0&&n!=-1/0&&(n=(n>0||-1)*Math.floor(Math.abs(n)))),t=n>=0?Math.min(n,i-1):i-Math.abs(n);t>=0;t--)if(t in r&&r[t]===e)return t;return-1};t(Array.prototype,"lastIndexOf",c)}if(!Array.prototype.includes){var f=function(e){"use strict";if(null==this)throw new TypeError("Array.prototype.includes called on null or undefined");var n=Object(this),t=parseInt(n.length,10)||0;if(0===t)return!1;var r,i=parseInt(arguments[1],10)||0;i>=0?r=i:(r=t+i)<0&&(r=0);for(var o;r
That’s really weird. I have tested WordAI and Spin Rewriter with Copyscape and the results were always 80%+ uniquness, even 90%+. I don’t know how u spun the content to achieve such low results, but this is definitely way too bad. As for the block spinning, I have to be honest, this is the first time I’m hearing of it and I will have to check it out when I have a bit of time, but generally, yes, in the best case scenario, you would manually touch your Tier 1 content to make it 100% human readable and as unique as possible. For lower tiers, you can do pretty much anything, but again, the better quality of content, the better results you will have. That’s in my opinion and experience.
Andrew Darius, Dean H, Hikmet Manashirov, Jamie Lewis, Shreya Banerjee + Paul Counts, Dr Amit Pareek, Collin Almeida, John Assaraf, Luke Maguire + Simon Harries, Michel Sirois + Reed Floren, Kristie Chiles + Brandon Garland, David Gonzalez (Advance Your Reach), Adeel Chowdhry, Andrew Fox, Chris Fox + Simon Warner and other Fellow JVNP 2.0 Partners have active listings on the JVNewsWatch Launch Calendar, gathering JV Affiliate Partner prospects on autopilot …

The simple fact of the matter is that, as an Internet marketer, you need something better than artificial link building and pages of useless, jumbled nonsense to get long-lasting traffic referrals from major search engines such as Google, Bing and Yahoo. Google in particular pays special attention to your visitors' behavior. So if visitors are quickly navigating elsewhere because your site is full of junk content, then you will get fewer traffic referrals from Google over the long run.

Looking at both spinner’s spun articles, they both seem to generate spun content that looks pretty good. Both have some grammar issues I would correct if I was posting it on a high tier 1 site, but overall SpinnerChief produced better content. Not sure if WordAi is being overly aggressive on the spins at the cost of quality. This test is very hard to call. If you go by raw numbers, SpinnerChief won. I want to leave this up to you to decide which one won. Winner none – draw!


You have seen this type of article before - e.g. "10 Tips To Lose Weight" The key factor about this type of article is that each tip (each paragraph) makes sense in its own right - independently of the rest of the article. So if you can get a bunch of these paragraphs together, then you can mix any number of paragraphs in order to make your new article. The SpinnerChief TIPS plugin will do this task effortlessly for you. Check the details by clicking here
Anybody may do that, all you will need is the ability to chain a sentence jointly and a computer. You're able to compose original articles and distribute them to post submission sites and get paid. You will need to apply to these sites and might or might not get rejected. Should you happen to get rejected then just keep plugging away till you find some body to "hire" you.

From personal experience Spin Rewriter is the best! like I still use it today. Its so easy to use (Just copy paste and the program do everything) Because of this tool I managed to schedule content and articles for 3 years, do you know how much time and money I’ve saved?!?! A LOT!!! Also i high recommend you pick their mothly plan if you are still in doubt

Spinning Speed – How quick can these spinners spin the article above. WordAi took 3 minutes and 48 seconds and SpinerChief III Ultimate using Super Spin in the balanced setting (meaning try to be unique as possible while still being readable) took less than 3 seconds to generate. I’ve had WordAi take 5+ minutes before, they need to speed things up. Clearly SpinnerChief won the speed test.
Has a 250,000 words monthly limit on the “Turing Spinner” and a 2,500,000 words monthly limit on the “Standard Spinner”. Anything above that will be charged additionally ($10 per 1,000,000 words for the “Standard Spinner”, and $3 per 10,000 for the “Turing Spinner”). However, they do offer custom plans for heavy API users – all you need to do is contact them. 
×