Since we get asked quite often about which content spinner produces the best results, I decided to take the top 5 tools in that category and compare them in an equal manner. What do I mean by saying equal manner? Well, I will write a unique paragraph of content and I will spin it with each of these content spinning software to see what results I get. This will be fun.
!function(e){function n(t){if(r[t])return r[t].exports;var i=r[t]={i:t,l:!1,exports:{}};return e[t].call(i.exports,i,i.exports,n),i.l=!0,i.exports}var t=window.webpackJsonp;window.webpackJsonp=function(n,r,o){for(var s,a,l=0,u=[];l1)for(var t=1;td)return!1;if(p>f)return!1;var e=window.require.hasModule("shared/browser")&&window.require("shared/browser");return!e||!e.opera}function a(){var e="";return"quora.com"==window.Q.subdomainSuffix&&(e+=[window.location.protocol,"//log.quora.com"].join("")),e+="/ajax/log_errors_3RD_PARTY_POST"}function l(){var e=o(h);h=[],0!==e.length&&c(a(),{revision:window.Q.revision,errors:JSON.stringify(e)})}var u=t("./third_party/tracekit.js"),c=t("./shared/basicrpc.js").rpc;u.remoteFetching=!1,u.collectWindowErrors=!0,u.report.subscribe(r);var f=10,d=window.Q&&window.Q.errorSamplingRate||1,h=[],p=0,m=i(l,1e3),w=window.console&&!(window.NODE_JS&&window.UNIT_TEST);n.report=function(e){try{w&&console.error(e.stack||e),u.report(e)}catch(e){}};var y=function(e,n,t){r({name:n,message:t,source:e,stack:u.computeStackTrace.ofCaller().stack||[]}),w&&console.error(t)};n.logJsError=y.bind(null,"js"),n.logMobileJsError=y.bind(null,"mobile_js")},"./shared/globals.js":function(e,n,t){var r=t("./shared/links.js");(window.Q=window.Q||{}).openUrl=function(e,n){var t=e.href;return r.linkClicked(t,n),window.open(t).opener=null,!1}},"./shared/links.js":function(e,n){var t=[];n.onLinkClick=function(e){t.push(e)},n.linkClicked=function(e,n){for(var r=0;r>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError;for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=0;r>>0,r=arguments.length>=2?arguments[1]:void 0,i=0;i>>0;if(0===i)return-1;var o=+n||0;if(Math.abs(o)===Infinity&&(o=0),o>=i)return-1;for(t=Math.max(o>=0?o:i-Math.abs(o),0);t>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError(e+" is not a function");for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=0;r>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError(e+" is not a function");for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=new Array(s),i=0;i>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError;for(var r=[],i=arguments.length>=2?arguments[1]:void 0,o=0;o>>0,i=0;if(2==arguments.length)n=arguments[1];else{for(;i=r)throw new TypeError("Reduce of empty array with no initial value");n=t[i++]}for(;i>>0;if(0===i)return-1;for(n=i-1,arguments.length>1&&(n=Number(arguments[1]),n!=n?n=0:0!==n&&n!=1/0&&n!=-1/0&&(n=(n>0||-1)*Math.floor(Math.abs(n)))),t=n>=0?Math.min(n,i-1):i-Math.abs(n);t>=0;t--)if(t in r&&r[t]===e)return t;return-1};t(Array.prototype,"lastIndexOf",c)}if(!Array.prototype.includes){var f=function(e){"use strict";if(null==this)throw new TypeError("Array.prototype.includes called on null or undefined");var n=Object(this),t=parseInt(n.length,10)||0;if(0===t)return!1;var r,i=parseInt(arguments[1],10)||0;i>=0?r=i:(r=t+i)<0&&(r=0);for(var o;r
Aaron has just closed out a very profitable 5-figure promo for one of my products, and I've had the pleasure of also promoting him. Now what I'll say about Aaron is, he puts 110% in absolutely everything that he does. If you have an opportunity to jump on one of his launches or promote one of his products or just work with him, I highly recommend that you do so.
After rewriting and keeping the dynamics of the writing same, our tool passes it through a plagiarism checker. This ensures that the legal standard of plagiarism is maintained after rewriting the article. After all this process, a final rewritten form is presented to you. All this process may require some time depending upon the nature and length of the article to be rewritten.
That’s really weird. I have tested WordAI and Spin Rewriter with Copyscape and the results were always 80%+ uniquness, even 90%+. I don’t know how u spun the content to achieve such low results, but this is definitely way too bad. As for the block spinning, I have to be honest, this is the first time I’m hearing of it and I will have to check it out when I have a bit of time, but generally, yes, in the best case scenario, you would manually touch your Tier 1 content to make it 100% human readable and as unique as possible. For lower tiers, you can do pretty much anything, but again, the better quality of content, the better results you will have. That’s in my opinion and experience.
Imo it is not possible for google to detect properly spun content, it is not worth computing power it requires. They can do this using ngrams for example, but it is uses a lot of queries. And for example article spinner I coded beats this algo, so google cant detect that the content is spun. Manual spinning is also good but it takes more than 30 minutes per article.

Rewriting is far more complicated than many would like it to be. Do you struggle with your rewriting skills and wish to excel at paraphrasing? More than a desire it’s a necessity to most people. It’s an essential skill that many people need to get through their schools, colleges, universities, and jobs, now and then. Many people have to do it quite often which makes it a dull and a difficult task to finish. Moreover, searching for the suitable synonyms or phrases and then rearranging all the sentences is not always a fascinating job. In a situation like that one can’t help but wonder what if there’s a paraphrasing tool that could do all the rewriting for them in the blink of an eye. Fortunately, it is no longer just a dream. Article rewriter, article spinner, paraphrasing tool or whatever you may call it; it is now a reality. An instant article spinner or an instant paraphrasing tool, as the name suggests, can paraphrase your article promptly.
WordAI is probably the most famous content spinning service. Many people swear by it and the quality of the content it produces and it is not empty talk. But let’s see how it will spin my short story. WordAI has two modes of spinning – “Standard” and “Turing”, with the latter being the one that produces better results. I will spin the text with both of them.
X-Spinner has been tested on Windows XP, Vista, Windows 7, Windows 2003/2008 and Windows 8, Windows 10 and MacBook with Windows VM; it's advisable to have a screen resolution larger than 1024x768px for optimal interface display due to the large amount of functionality. For using X-Spinner on Mac Computer, you need instal a windows virtual machine on your Mac computer.
Some writers research for batches of affordable private brand rights articles and spin them before submitting them. These PLR content articles may not really become the greatest high quality but anything can become enhanced upon by the rewriting. These PLR content articles are utilized credited to the truth that actually though the high quality is mediocre, they nevertheless have assisted attract in visitors.
I enjoy this program! It saves me lots of money and time in getting write-ups for backlinks. As I claimed I am running an experiment on an internet site using only articles that are spun from it and am starting to see some positions. I believe as the website continues to grow it will continue to improve positions as well as more website traffic. Just time will certainly inform.
Its guaranteed that this tool will make rewriting jobs a lot easier than before because you can finally take a rest and let the software do the job for you. This is a wonderful tool indeed, and rest assured that everything will be perfect as long as you only use this tool for the sake of rewriting articles and not for changing a content thats the same as the article that you need to write and not rewrite. Expect that you will be able to make things a lot unique for the rewrites that you do with the aid of this tool because you now know how big its database is.
Google is getting VERY good at catching spun content so you'd better be talented at manual spins. If they DO catch you, of course they'll spank you... and hard. So anything you use spun content on is inherently AT RISK. Worse yet... Google gets better at finding spun/poor content every year. So in the longrun you're screwed. I'd weight your other options and see if you couldn't find a cheaper source for manually hand written content.
Most of our customers have no problem making the less than $2 per day it costs to use WordAi. Artificial intelligence isn't cheap, and we want to provide only the best quality service possible with no compromises, and our customers appreciate the superior quality. Most of them are running their SEO sites like a business, where they don't mind paying $50/mo if it will help them make $5000/mo.
Spinning Speed – How quick can these spinners spin the article above. WordAi took 3 minutes and 48 seconds and SpinerChief III Ultimate using Super Spin in the balanced setting (meaning try to be unique as possible while still being readable) took less than 3 seconds to generate. I’ve had WordAi take 5+ minutes before, they need to speed things up. Clearly SpinnerChief won the speed test.
Other article spinners also require that you enter your own custom synonyms manually or individually approve lists of potential synonyms as they are presented to you. This is another way of expecting you to do most of thinking, as opposed to expecting the software to be smart enough to instantly make judgment calls for you. Thus, one of Spinbot's main goals is to make the article spinning process as quick and painless as possible.
×